The Department of Justice has launched an active investigation into the use of an autopen to authorize presidential pardons during the final days of the previous administration. Ed Martin, recently appointed as the nation’s pardon attorney and head of the DOJ’s Weaponization Working Group, confirmed that the probe has been ongoing for several weeks. He initiated the inquiry while serving as interim U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia.
Martin revealed that his office received a tip from a whistleblower, and that several individuals have since retained legal counsel in relation to the case. He stressed the significance of preserving the legitimacy of the pardon process and promoting transparency for the American public.
“Roughly ten days ago, a whistleblower with deep connections to prominent Democratic leaders came forward, alleging that access to the autopen process was tightly guarded and may have been exploited for personal benefit,” Martin said during an appearance on the show 2WAY Tonight. “We are approaching the matter with diligence and treating the claims with the gravity they deserve.”
Notable Figures Under Investigation
Martin indicated that several high-ranking officials from the previous administration are being reviewed for possible involvement in the pardon proceedings. Individuals named include:
- Ron Klain, former White House Chief of Staff
- Anita Dunn, senior advisor to President Biden
- Robert Bauer, ex-White House counsel under President Obama
- Steve Ricchetti, former presidential counselor and campaign manager
- First Lady Jill Biden
Martin clarified that the investigation is procedural in nature and does not presume misconduct by anyone named until a full review of the evidence is completed.
Concerns Over Signature Authenticity
Scrutiny intensified after reports emerged that official documents bearing the president’s signature were issued during periods when he was traveling or not directly overseeing decisions. Some former staff members have claimed that aides may have executed documents without direct presidential oversight, prompting further investigation.
There is also growing interest in the timing and authorization of certain executive orders and legislative approvals, particularly in relation to how they were processed.
Congressional Involvement
Separately, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee has requested interviews with key personnel from the prior administration, including medical and administrative staff. Lawmakers are seeking clarity on whether any delegation of executive powers occurred without proper documentation.
Committee Chair James Comer highlighted the need for consistent accountability within the executive branch and suggested that new legislation may be proposed to improve oversight related to presidential authority and document authentication.
Next Steps
DOJ officials emphasize that the investigation aims to uphold the rule of law and protect public confidence in the nation’s institutions. Though still in early stages, the inquiry is expected to shed light on how executive powers were managed and whether standard protocols were upheld during critical decision-making periods.